More About The Political Advertising This Year
Dems and Reps are Similar in Proportion of Negative Ads,
but Dem Strategy Likely Driven by Desire to Draw Attention Away from
the Policy Environment
(MIDDLETOWN, CT –) As we reported last week, “claims that 2010 is
the most negative election to date may be premature. In an analysis of
close to 900,000 airings from January 1 to October 5, 2010, the Wesleyan
Media Project finds that the distribution of positive, negative and
contrast ads is comparable to 2008 in proportion, if not in volume.” In
an update to that release, and with a focus on House and Senate races,
we continue to find similar rates of negativity. Furthermore, we find
that Democrats and Republicans are airing similar proportions of
negative (and positive) spots in federal races. However, there is one
crucial difference: Democrats are using personal attacks at much higher
rates than Republicans and a much higher rate than Democrats in 2008.
"The use of personal attacks actually makes sense for the Democrats this
year,” said Michael Franz, co-director of the Wesleyan Media Project
and associate professor of government at Bowdoin College. “The issue
environment does not really favor them, in that many Obama policies are
unpopular, so many Democrats are choosing to point out the personal
foibles of their opponents.”