COUNCIL
WORKING RULES
Back
on April 5, 2011, the Council Working Rules was first put on the
agenda. Since April 5, 2011, it has been discussed and the council
held a few workshops in order to get everything perfect. Finally, on
June 21, 2011, the council presented the final product to be vote on
and it passed with only one councilor (Cote) voting NOT to approve
the final document. Since June 21st,
the Town Council realizes they really screwed up the Council Working
Rules and so now, one month later, the council is having a workshop
to correct the screw-ups in the Council Working Rules they worked so
hard on and approved. OPS!!!!!!
Mrs.
Pomelow started this movement to change the Council Working Rules and it was
because the meetings were so long and she felt the council was not
getting enough town business accomplished. Yet, on the evening of
the vote, Mrs. Pomelow was nowhere to be found. If they want to
improve the Council Working Rules; they should require the sponsor to
be present at the meeting to explain the reasons for the change. If
the sponsor cannot be present then the item should be tabled until
the sponsor is able to be present. Now this would be worthy of
changing the Council Working Rules.
I
believe moving the Audience Participation under Public Hearing was
another excellent and worthy change. This allows someone to bring up
NEW business and new business only. After Audience Participation is
complete, the resident has the option of staying for the entire
meeting or whatever portion the resident is interested in and then
can leave. I can see how this would speed up the meetings.
However,
the council has demonstrated how ineffective they really are by
spending two months on these working rules and then voting on them.
Now the council is having a workshop to rework the Council Working
Rules because the author of the changes was totally inept the first
time. I can only image what the residents of the town are in for
this time around. I would not put it past the council to have the
Town Council meetings closed to the residents. This would really
speed up the process of town business. Keep in mind, these changes
are meant to keep the residents from knowing what the council is
doing. There are so many deals done behind closed doors now it is
not funny. Bowie holds a meeting, in Eldridge’s office before
every meeting to ensure the puppets know their scripts. The only
councilor NOT allowed to participate in the pre-meeting is Councilor
Cote. Of course, these pre-meetings are totally illegal but they do
not care because they do what they want and are protected by Eldridge
and Brooks.
Mrs.
Pomelow wants to restrict all comments on issues being voted on in
order to speed up the meetings. Once the sponsor explains the reason
for the changes and the councilors have asked their questions; the
audience has the right to ask questions. The input from the audience
is critical for the councilors to know how the public feels on the
issue. As I have told the council many times, Eldridge never
presents all the facts on any issues. I cannot understand how the
Town Council can vote on an issue without knowing all the facts.
This is why it is vital to hear what the audience has to say.
Maine
Revised Status Title 13-C, 708. Conduct of Meeting, paragraph 3.
Fairness of rules states “Rules adopted for the meeting and the
conduct of a meeting held pursuant to this chapter must be fair to
shareholders.” I believe this means the residents have a right
under this statue to voice their opinion prior to the Town Council
voting on town business. The Town of Lisbon is Incorporated and
therefore the residents are the shareholders. I hope whoever decides
to take credit for the upcoming rules changes will keep this in mind.
Is
it possible to have this council produce a worthy Council Working
Rules this time? Every time a council member wants to talk about
wasting valuable time, remember, the sitting council screwed up the
revised Council Working Rules and are having to redo them. A wise
man once told me if you do it right the first time you will never
have to waste valuable time fixing it. Who is wasting the council’s
time now; that would be the council themselves? This clearly
demonstrates how effective this council is and how much the councils
read what is put before them prior to a vote. This council “rubber
stamps” whatever is put before them.
We
really need to change this setting council to be more effective.
Larry
A. Fillmore
Concerned
Citizen