16 Am Jur
2d, Sec
177 late 2d, Sec
256:
The general misconception is that
any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law
constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the
supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be
In agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a
law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is
succinctly stated as follows:
The General rule is that an
unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law
is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for
any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of
it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so
branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is
as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute
leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would
be had the statute not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is
void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties,
confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or
authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no
acts performed under it.....
A
void act cannot be legally
consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot
operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as
a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the lend, it is
superseded thereby.
No
one Is bound to obey an
unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce
it.
Jon
Roland:
Strictly speaking, an
unconstitutional statute is not a
"law", and should not be called a "law",
even if it is sustained
by a court, for a finding that a statute or other official act
is constitutional does not make it so, or confer any authority
to anyone to enforce it.
All
citizens and legal residents of the United States, by their
presence on the territory of the United States, are subject to
the militia duty, the duty of the social compact that creates
the society, which requires that each, alone and in concert with
others, not only obey the Constitution and constitutional
official acts, but help enforce them, if necessary, at the risk
of one's life.
Any
unconstitutional act of an official will at least be a violation
of the oath of that official to execute the duties of his
office, and therefore grounds for his removal from office. No
official immunity or privileges of rank or position survive the
commission of unlawful acts. If it violates the rights of
individuals, it is also likely to be a crime, and the militia
duty obligates anyone aware of such a violation to investigate
it, gather evidence for a prosecution, make an arrest, and if
necessary, seek an indictment from a grand jury, and if one is
obtained, prosecute the offender in a court of law.
http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/16amjur2nd.htm