Friday, November 17, 2017
2018-2019 $162,152.78 $127,884.46 $34,267.92
2019-2020 $187,762.90 $149,172.84 $39,590.06
2020-2021 $251,354.03 $199,245.74 $52,108.29
Friday, November 10, 2017
Wednesday, November 8, 2017
On October 25, 2017, Dorothy Fitzgerald and myself arrived at the town Office to attend a meeting of the sub-committee on Emergency Medical Service in Lisbon announced by Councilor Norman Albert at the October 3, 2017 Town Council meeting. I was greeted by the Town Manager, Diane Barnes, who informed me the meeting was cancelled until the Request for Procurement (RFP) was received. I asked Mrs. Barnes why there was no notification of the cancellation posted anywhere and was informed she notified the sub-committee members. I asked why she did not notify the people of the cancellation.
Sunday, October 29, 2017
I support Scott Gaisson in his running for the Maine House of RepresentativesHe would work hard for the citizens of Lisbon and the State of Maine.
When I found that he was running I asked him if he would place one of his
political signs in on my property, which he or one of his supporters did.
weeks ago. I respect that my neighbor has a right to support a candidate
of his choice and place a sign on his property.
A little over a week ago someone removed Scott Gaisson's sign, from my property.
I found it in the middle of the road, in the School Street, Route 196 intersection,
badly damaged after being run over by numerous vehicles.
I found the sign and put it again on the wire stand. A few days later Mr.. Gaisson
replaced the damaged sign with a new one.
Sometime between Friday evening and Saturday morning Scott Gaisson's
sign was again stolen.
Not only was Scott Gaisson's sign missing, but a second one for his opponent
was placed on my neighbor's property.
not once but twice. The police office who responded suggested that the sign on my property
was taken by teenagers.
Kids who had a new sign to place on my neighbor's property at the same time.
Really?????????? This is improper politics at it's worst.
House of Representative.
no questions asked.
He and I have more respect for each other that that.
TO TAKE DOWN, REMOVE, DAMAGE A POLITICAL SIGN IS AGAINST THE LAW
Dot FitzgeraldA Lisbon Concerned Citizen
Thursday, October 19, 2017
Friday, October 13, 2017
Sunday, October 8, 2017
Monday, October 2, 2017
Thursday, September 14, 2017
Saturday, September 9, 2017
Sunday, September 3, 2017
It sure would be nice in here in Lisbon we had transparency in our local government as promised by the current Administration. Even the Home page of the town website states there is transparency in Lisbon. I would like for the Administration to define their definition of “transparency” to the people of Lisbon.
I have been laid up for a while and wanted to review what was going on while I was not feeling so well. I followed the instructions on the town website to review the Town Council meetings to catch-up. However, when I did so, the Town Council meetings come up just fine but there is NO Sound. I had to go back to June 27th to find a meeting with sound so you could hear them. At this point, I must apologize for not being able to read lips. So please tell me again how this is “Transparency in Local Government”? The people cannot hear what being said at these meetings, is it still “Transparency”?
Now, I can explain the problem to you. The problem is that once the town sends the meetings to Clerkbase; who updates the town website no one follows through to ensure it is posted right. This is the problem with our current Administration. They believe that once they send it to ClerkBase their responsibility is finished.
It is also amazing that every one of the School Board videos come out crystal clear and never has a problem. It is only the Town Council meetings that have all the issues. It has been that way for several years and no one can correct the situation.
Can we still call this “Transparency in Local Government”?
Thursday, April 20, 2017
This all started when the Town Manager, Diane Barnes’, with the help of Lydia Colston, Finance Director, conned the Town Council into amending the Fund Balance Policy on March 7, 2017. This reduced the requirement to maintain an Unassigned Fund Balance on hand from $2.85 million to $1.74 million. This freed up approximately $1.11 million of our tax dollars.
This left Mrs. Barnes and the Town Council with a problem of what to do with our tax dollars. It did not take them long to decide to spend these dollars on things like replacing two new cruisers; upgrade the unnecessary communication center; purchase a wheeler; a paint spreader; a new trailer and a salt shed just to name a few items. All of these items are going to add to the amount of money it takes to operate this town. You do realize the tax dollars are determined by the amount of money it takes to operate the town. With these additions our taxes will continue to rise to cover these costs. However, the purchase will be made by the Unassigned Fund Balance for this year but on the years out taxpayers will have to cover the maintenance and operating cost with more tax dollars.
Here is a concept that Mrs. Barnes and at least four of the Town Council do not want to hear. Since these funds are our tax dollars, why not use them to reduce the current operating cost of the town and reduce our taxes for a change. Can anyone remember a year when our taxes did not go up? It certainly has been a while. We know that Councilors Ward, Brunelle, Crafts and Albert are not interested in reducing the operating cost of the town because they had a chance to save the taxpayers $200,000.00 this year by closing the communication center and did not. Saving taxpayer money is a concept these individuals cannot handle. This is our tax dollars so why not use it where it will help the taxpayers the most.
Reducing the operating cost would reduce the requirement for more tax dollars. Mrs. Barnes and these members of the Town Council cannot figure out; that you have to reduce spending to reduce the operating cost of the town. Their answer to everything is to spend, spend spend.
YOU JUST CANNOT FIX STUPID!!!!
For years now, I have been telling the community that E. Ryan Leighton has no credentials but receiving a very large salary. It is amazing that the Town Manager, Mrs. Barnes, has not assisted Mr. Leighton in obtaining the necessary training. Everyone, including the Town Council, has let Mr. Leighton slide on everything.
This goes back to when he was impersonating an Engineer. The state had to step in and tell the town that he was not a qualified Licensed Professional Engineer. Then there was the Environmental Protection Agency fining the town for several problems and one of these was the sewer department did not have Standard Operating Procedures. This is a basic action all professionals know to do when taking over a new job.
If you have ever watched a Town Council meeting, you should have noticed that almost every time Mr. Leighton presents anything there are more items unknown than known. However, the Town Council allows him to slide almost every time. You would think that someone would try and educate Mr. Leighton so it would improve the quality of the process. Look and see how Request for Procurements (RFP) is processed without controversy.
If the town is going to keep employing Mr. Leighton, it is only fair that he receive training. It is Mrs. Barnes’ responsibility to ensure your town employees are qualified to perform their duties. She has been allowing this shoddy work to continue without getting Mr. Leighton assistance.
If you doubt anything I am saying go to the Town Council video for April 11, 2017 and start a 2 hours and 31 minutes and listen to the dialog pertaining to the Salt Shed. Play close attention to how many questions Mr. Leighton cannot answer without the help of the Town Council. He is asking for $250,000.00 based on a guess because Lewiston salt shed cost $200,000.00 several years ago. I am sure that we do not use as much salt as Lewiston; so our requirements would be different. Also, try to find out where Mr. Leighton plans on locating it; the size, or even the size of the current salt shed. There are so many unknowns so how can anyone make a sound decision. The video is 3 hours and 12 minutes and the Council has more unanswered questions then answered.
Shouldn’t we expect a Department Head to know everything about an item when they are presenting them?
It is amazing that the Town Manager and the Town Council are working extremely hard to increase the operating cost of the town. This is why our taxes continue to go up.
The Town Manager and the four members (Ward, Brunelle, Crafts and Albert) of the Town Council refuse to try and lower the operating cost of the town. These individuals are devising ways to increase spending instead of looking for ways to lower our taxes.
There are so many example of this it is not funny. The first example is the Lisbon Communication Center. These people had a chance to save every year approximately $200,000.00 tax dollars a YEAR and did not. Another example is we have a Department Head who has NO credentials. He also has NO managerial skills or common sense. I am talking about E. Ryan Leighton our Public Works Director and Superintendent of Sewer.
There are so many examples of how very incompetent he truly is but I will so in a three part explanation. The first one is his excessive spending and how the taxpayers are force to pay for his lack training.
Remember when he had to have a 4-ton Asphalt Reclaimer (Hot Box). So the taxpayers purchased the equipment so that the town could improve our roads. How is that worked out for us? Our roads are a total disaster including the access way at the Public Works Garage. I do not remember having these kinds of problems when Button Beale was in charge of Public Works.
Another example is the chipper we purchased. During the last Town Council meeting the Town Council voted to approve a contract for an outside company to come in and do the trimming and chipping. The reason give is the volume was too much for Public Works to do and Public Works did not have the manpower to do it themselves. Why did we purchase it if we did not have the manpower? The same as the “Hot Box” required a Class A license and Public Works does not have enough Class A licensed individuals to operate the Hot Box”.
These are just two pieces of equipment sitting in the Public Works garage area the taxpayers purchased that are not being utilized as needed because Mr. Leighton has no managerial skills.
Also, since the Town Manager, Diane Barnes, arrived she has been covering for him. She encourages him to purchase more equipment and supports him with the Council. Mrs. Barnes has absolutely no desire to make Mr. Leighton get training or stop him from wasting our tax dollars.
Sunday, April 16, 2017
Friday, April 7, 2017
The town of Lisbon is stealing tax dollars in the name of COLA. What is a “Cost-of-Living Adjustment – COLA? An adjustment made to Social Security and Supplemental Security Income to counteract the effects of inflation. Cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) are generally equal to the percentage increase in the consumer price index for urban wage earners and clerical workers (CPI-W) for a specific period. This definition can be found at http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cola.asp
The Town Manager is responsible for establishing the percentage of COLA which has been paid to town employees for the past five to six years. However, her recommendation to the Town Council is illegal until the Town Council approves the budget and then it becomes legal. There has not been a 2% increase in the consumer price index in longer than six years. Also, instead of the adjustment being paid to wage earners and clerical workers; it is being paid to management too. It is also in the Town Manager’s contract that she gets any increase paid.
So now let’s take a look at Mrs. Barnes decision to pay COLA to ALL employees. Under the Federal system, the consumer price index is utilized to determine the percentage based on inflation. These past six years, there has been NO increase in inflation so why are the town employees being paid COLA. What can be the measuring device used to justify the payment of COLA?
1. Must be a town employee.
2. Must be breathing or at least have a pulse.
There is absolute no other justification for a COLA increase every year. So let’s look at the impact: an employee being paid $30,000.00 after five years of 2% COLA is now $33,123.42 and an employee being paid $90,000.00 after five years of 2% COLA is now $99,367.27. Remember, these are our tax dollars being spent by the Town Manager and our Town Council. So what is the town getting in return, nothing? Employees are being paid a salary to do their jobs; so what are these tax dollars being paid for with no inflation?
The Town Manager uses a lot of terms to confuse the Town Council. I will explain what I am talking about. The term “Undesignated Fund” is now “Unassigned Fund Balance”; “COLA” is being used instead of “wage increase” and in the Town’s Annual Report the Town Salary Report reports the “Salary” which is far from the truth. The “Salary” in the Annual Report is the amount paid to that individual during the year. This includes overtime and any additional payments so it is NOT a salary. This tactic is how the Town Manager keeps everyone confused. There are so many terms used in our town that has other title in other areas but they are the same. This is how the Town Manager gets things by the Town Council.
I love our employees and think they work hard for us for the most part but paying COLA for doing their job and being compensated very well. They also receive longevity pay also.
I think if you are receiving our tax dollars, the town should receive something in return. The Town Council should never have approved COLA for the past five or six years and they should not approve it now. To take tax dollars with no return is stealing.
Call your Councilors and voice your concerns because it is your tax dollars. You should have a right to voice how you want to spend it.
Wednesday, April 5, 2017
Are Larry Fillmore and Joe Hill the only ones' concerned about what is going on with the Town Office and the 2017 budget?
If all goes at Town Manager Diane Barnes and the Town Council plan, town expenses will increase by 19.2%! ! ! ! ! !
THIS 19.2 % INCREASE DOES NOT EVEN INCLUDE THE SCHOOL BUDGET! ! !
How many of you out there received a Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) increase in your paycheck this year?
The U S Government did not think the Cost of Living increased this year so Social Security recipients did not get any.
Evidently the Town Manager and Town Council do not agree, so all town employees are set to be receiving one.
Most deserve it, but at what cost to homeowners that did not get one?
If Mrs Barnes and the Town Council deem it necessary that town employees receive a COLA they need to make serious cuts in the town budget elsewhere.
As Joe Hill said recently, with a 19.2 % budget increase, the town is "HEADED FOR BANKRUPCY".
Any wonder that the Town Council and Management do not want the citizens to vote on the town budget as we do on the school budget?
My fellow Citizens and taxpayers, attend town council meetings and budget workshops.
If you cannot attend, watch them on TV.
Meetings are aired on Channel 7 at 7 p.m. on the Fridays after each meeting.
Submitted By: Dot Fritzgerald