AUGUSTA
– A bill which would uphold the Interstate Commerce
Clause of the U.S. Constitution by allowing Maine farmers, fishermen,
tradesmen and other individuals to ply their trades without
interference from unfair federal mandates has been endorsed by the
Maine Republican Liberty Caucus.
An
Act to Prohibit Enforcement of Federal Laws in Violation of the
Constitution of the United States (LD 1172) was introduced in the
125th
Legislature by Rep. Melvin Newendyke (R-Litchfield). The bill
prohibits federal or state officials or government employees from
enforcing any federal act, order, law, statute, rule or regulation
that attempts to regulate goods grown, manufactured or made within
the state for consumption within Maine.
“The
Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution is valid for
regulation of interstate commerce but nowhere does the federal
government have constitutional authority to regulate intrastate
commerce,” said Maine RLC Chair Ken Lindell, a former state
legislator.
Lindell
said the federal government consistently oversteps its authority when
Congress or regulatory agencies promulgate rulings which have an
impact on commerce within Maine borders.
“Organic
dairy farmers, for instance, who produce milk products for local
consumption, are handcuffed by federal directives which prevent them
from doing business. Fishermen who land fish for local consumers face
expensive and unnecessary restrictions on their livelihoods because
of draconian federal rules. Small businesspeople throughout Maine
suffer because of unconstitutional intrusion by federal agencies,”
Lindell explained. “I even had a tradesman tell me that he would
have to charge an extra $3,000 for a kitchen renovation simply to
comply with federal regulations because our house was built before
1978. With all of the wonderful old homes and family farms in our
state, that is evidence of how these federal actions have had an
unfair impact on Maine people.”
The
bill, which is before the Judiciary Committee, notes that the power
to regulate intrastate commerce is reserved to the states or the
people under the Ninth and Tenth amendments.
LD
1172 reads in part, “A person may not enforce or attempt to enforce
or attempt to enforce a federal law that regulates or attempts to
regulate goods grown, manufactured or made in this State or services
performed in this State when those goods or services are sold,
maintained, retained or performed exclusively in this State.”
A
federal official who tries to enforce an unconstitutional federal
mandate could be charged with a Class C crime, punishable by up to
five years in prison and a fine of up to $5,000. A state official
could be charged with a Class D crime, punishable by less than one
year in prison and a fine of up to $2,000.
“It’s
sad that it has to come to a bill like this,” Lindell said, “but
government has grown so large and overreaching that it is necessary
to reinforce the constitutional separation of powers between the
federal and state governments. It also protects the many
conscientious government employees by giving them legal protection
from being forced to follow unconstitutional directives.”
Lindell
said the Republican Liberty Caucus is guided by a statement of
principles for smaller government and individual liberty. He will
testify at the Committee hearing on behalf of the organization.
“We
have endorsed LD 1172 because it is consistent with our principles
and it protects the hardworking people of Maine who are producers and
contributors to society from undue harassment by bureaucrats who
flaunt government power over their lives,” he said.
Maine
RLC previously endorsed a Resolution sponsored by Rep, Richard Cebra
(R-Naples) which reasserts states rights and would nullify
unconstitutional federal mandates imposed on Maine.
Maine RLC is part
of the national Republican Liberty Caucus, a grassroots organization
of libertarian-leaning Republicans who work within the party for
policies which promote smaller government and individual liberty.