WELCOME TO THE LISBON REPORTER. In an effort to keep our community informed of what is going on at local and Federal levels of government, we decided to create this on-line newspaper. It is our hope that this on-line newspaper will help you stay informed so that you can get involved and take action for the benefit of our ENTIRE community. Thank you for visiting and please check back frequently for information about what is happening in
LISBON/LISBON FALLS, MAINE USA
Latest Hard Metal Pricng
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
Apply This Locally,News Media Corruption Pressure From Above, Pressure From Below
Lisbon,
The elites have committed a great deal of time, money, and study to figuring out how to manipulate the masses.
And they have gotten darn good at it.
Pressure from above and pressure from below is a technique they fall back on frequently, and many of us keep falling for it...
Pressure from above, pressure from below
Using the opposition to get your way
How it works...
The Hegelian Dialectic is a philosophical approach that in principle
explains how human beings progress toward a better and more egalitarian
condition but in practice provides the power elite with a strategy for
controlling society.
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (August 27, 1770 – November 14, 1831) was
among the most consequential philosophers of the Age of Enlightenment.
His was heavily influenced by Plato, whose social ideal was rule by an
elite composed of philosopher-kings. Though Hegel may not have intended
to provide a Platonic methodology for the modern-day control of the many
by the few, that is how his insights have been used.
The Platonic influence on Hegel was reinforced by the age in which he
worked. Hegel accepted that "enlightened" human beings are responsible
for their own destiny, and that culture and history are a product of
human development, which in turn is driven by reason. Hegel subscribed
to the Rousseauian notion that humans are a blank slate, a tabula rasa.
In fact, Hegel was a big fan of the French, including the authoritarian
leader Napoleon and the French Revolution itself, a bloodbath he
described as the realization of more perfect freedom.
Today most behavioral scientists see human beings not as purely rational
or perfectly elastic but as complex creatures, many of whose behaviors
are instinctual or biologically programmed. This has not hindered the
practical application of Hegel's conceptual tools, however, which have
been used as an effective methodology of control for at least the past
century.
It is necessary to examine the dialectic in a little more detail to
understand this. Hegel postulated that each stage of human advance – and
the course of history itself – was driven by an argument (thesis), a
counterargument (anti-thesis) and finally a synthesis of the two into a
more advanced argument, at which point the process restarted. For Hegel,
the dialectic could explain everything – art, culture, history, even
nature.
From our more modern vantage point, Hegel's dialectic may not seem so
persuasive as an explanation of all things – and in fact, it probably is
not. But for the elite of his day, and for the monetary elite today,
the Hegelian dialectic provides tools for the manipulation of society.
To move the public from point A to point B, one need only find a
spokesperson for a certain argument and position him or her as an
authority. That person represents Goalpost One. Another spokesperson is
positioned on the other side of the argument, to represent Goalpost Two.
Argument A and B can then be used to manipulate a given social
discussion. If one wishes, for instance, to promote Idea C, one merely
needs to promote the arguments of Goalpost One (that tend to promote
Idea C) more effectively than the arguments of Goalpost Two. This forces
a slippage of Goalpost Two's position. Thus both Goalpost One and
Goalpost Two advance downfield toward Idea C. Eventually, Goalpost Two
occupies Goalpost One's original position. The "anti-C" argument now
occupies the pro-C position. In this manner whole social conversations
are shifted from, say, a debate over market freedom vs. socialism to a
debate about the degree of socialism that is desirable.
The Hegelian dialectic is a powerful technique for influencing the
conversations of cultures and nations, especially if one already
controls (owns) much of the important media in which the arguments take
place. One can then, as the monetary elite characteristically do,
emphasize one argument at the expense of the other, effectively shifting
the positions of Goalposts One and Two.
No comments:
Post a Comment