LAWLESS LISBON
“HOME OF SPOT
ZONING”
At Tuesday night's Town Council Workshop,
Don Fellows and John Potvin, from the Planning Board,
Lisbon Planning Board Member Don Fellows
Lisbon Planning Board Member John Potvin
gave the Town
Council a scaled down version of the same presentation on the Gartley
Street zoning change and the “Conditional Usages” for Open Rural
District 1 (Route 9).
Lisbon Town Councilor Mike Bowie
Editor's Note: Hey Mike, is that "Gorilla Glue" you use to keep you toupee and hearing aids stuck to your scalp or Super Glue?
Inquiring Minds Want To Know???
During the discussion Councilor Bowie asked the
town attorney Therriault for his opinion over whether or not this was
“spot zoning”. Therriault did NOT provide the
council with a legal definition of “Spot Zoning” but instead
provided his own rendition of the situation with pure double-talk.
At no time did he answer Councilor Bowie’s question.
This is the
method Therrault utilizes to make his money by providing his opinion
instead of a legal review. All Therriault sees is “Cha Ching”
dollar signs.
Roger Cote, a member of the audience, offered a legal
definition off of his phone but no one was really interested.
“Spot Zoning” is a violation of
Maine Law. “Spot zoning is the application
of zoning to a specific parcel of land within a larger zoned area
when the rezoning is usually at odds with a city's master plan and
current zoning restrictions.” as defined by Wikipedia.
U.S Legal definition can be found at
http://definitions.uslegal.com/s/spot-zoning/?puslf=gl+defi+Spot+Zoning+Law&gclid=CPvSubba_a4CFegQNAodLVIo5Q
These two definitions clearly define
what “Spot Zoning” is and the Gartley Street proposal meets all
the conditions as outlined by definition. Double-talk by Therriault
will not change the situation but it will open the town to lawsuits
and possible sanctions by the state. Both Fellows and Potvin are well
aware of the spot zoning definitions and are willing to ignore them.
The Planning Board has a history of
ignoring ordinances. At the last Planning Board meeting, they voted
to ignore the Wellhead Protection Ordinance and allowed an emergency
access strip across Zone 1 of the Wellhead Protection Ordinance.
Lisbon Town Councilor Gina Mason
Also, when Councilor Mason’s husband wanted to legalize his
business on Route 9, this very board utilized a “Conditional Usage”
to approve his request. The only problem with their decision is they
cited “Sec 70-353 Conditional Usages, paragraph 3, Other;
subparagraph g, Temporary construction, excavating, fabrication or
processing.” without an expiration date.
This now makes this
temporary condition permanent. This conditional usage clearly states
it is a temporary condition but the Planning Board made it permanent.
Is this special treatment for a councilor or possibly English is
not their first language?
Why do we have
ordinances and laws if they are going to be ignored?
Larry Fillmore
Concerned Citizen
1 comment:
You claim to be trying to do what is best for Lisbon, that is a complete crock, you are doing everything in your power to disrupt and derail efforts to do what is best for Lisbon. You want to make a real difference? Join one of the boards, provide constructive feedback and not accusations, and know what the heck you are talking about before you open your mouth. Better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Post a Comment