CENSORSHIP OR
CONCEALMENT
When the Town Council decided to change
the Council Working Rules by moving Audience Participation to the
beginning of the meeting. The intent seemed to eliminate the people from speaking on
voting issues during the discussion phase of the process. It was with
the understanding the council would publish, under Agenda
Documentation, all items being discussed and voted on during the
meeting. This enabled the Public to know and understand what was
being voted on and could provide input during Audience Participation.
At the last town council meeting, this
was not the case. There were no Agenda Documentations pertaining to
neither Brooks’ presentation nor the two issues Brooks asked the
council to vote on.
These issues were:
VOTE (2012-48B) Councilor Bowie,
seconded by Councilor Ward move to support the Lisbon Consolidation
plan consuming the County dispatch. Order passed – Vote 6-0.
VOTE (2012-48B) Councilor Bowie,
seconded by Councilor Ward move that if the County proposal failed,
then Lisbon will keep Lisbon’s dispatch and not go with the LA 911
plan. Order passed – Vote 5-1 (Opposed: Mason)
Both of these
items are critical to the citizens of Lisbon and the Public should
have been given the opportunity to provide input. This Lisbon
Communications Center issue involved the lives of everyone living in
Lisbon. As you can see by who made the motion and who seconded the
motion; that puts loyalty and logistics before human life.
The council should always allow the
citizens of Lisbon the opportunity to speak on all issues prior to
voting on them. If, as is this case, the Public had no prior
notification of what was being considered the vote should have been
tabled until the people had an opportunity to provide input to the
council before they voted on the issues. There was no emergency!
Apparently, the town council did not
want the Public to know what was going on because there is no video
tape due to technical difficulties while the camera was being
operated by a veteran operator.
Larry Fillmore
Concerned Citizen
No comments:
Post a Comment