YOU BE THE JUDGE!!!!
During the first of September 2012, I brought it to the
attention of the Assessing Clerk that LaRochelle Properties, LLC was receiving
a “Homestead Exemption”. At that time,
the Assessing Clerk informed me it was legal.
I could not accept this to be true so I contacted the Maine Property
Division and asked the state if it was legal for a LLC to receive a “Homestead
Exemption” and the state told me “NO”. I
then contacted the town Assessing Office and relayed this information to the
clerk. Mrs. Malloy informed me that she had been in contact with the state
and they confirmed the fact a LLC does not qualify for a “Homestead Exemption”. Mrs. Malloy told me she would correct this
situation.
At no time did we discuss who was to blame. According to the documentations dated April
23, 1998, LaRochelle Properties, LLC has been receiving the “Homestead
Exemption” since 1999.
Editor's note: The list of Town Councilors on letterhead is also incorrect. Mike Bowie and Lori Pomelow are no longer councilors but perhaps are still active behind the curtain of dignity, integrity, and honor.
Lisbon Tax Assessor William Van Tuinen
However, Mr. Van Tuinen’s letter contains a lot of double
talk which I plan on correcting. First,
let’s start with defining “illegally” for him.
il·le·gal [ih-lee-guh l]Show
IPA adjective
1. forbidden by law or statute.
2. contrary to or forbidden by official rules, regulations,
etc.: The referee ruled that it was an illegal forward pass.
noun
3. Informal. illegal alien.
er·ro·ne·ous
[uh-roh-nee-uh s, e-roh-]Show IPA adjective
1. containing error; mistaken; incorrect; wrong: an erroneous
answer.
2. straying from what is moral, decent, proper, etc
I called it “illegal” because according to the Maine
Property Division, a LLC does not qualify for this exemption. Since this is the legal determination, I call it illegal. Mr. Van Tuinen
can call it anything he wants to include “erroneous” if it makes him feel any
better.
In Mr. Van Tuinen’s letter he states and I quote “I have not yet assessed any
supplemental taxes to correct erroneously granted homestead exemptions deducted
from the assessed valuation of an LLC”.
I brought this to their attention back in September and Mr. Van Tuinen has
not taken any action. I wonder why? There
are only three scenarios to explain this:
(1) lazy; (2) covering for a Good Old Boy; or (3) hoping it would go
away. There certainly is no
reason to contact the state for any further guidance because they have already
ruled on this.
Lisbon Town Council Chairman Fern Larochelle
At the last town council meeting, Chairman LaRochelle was
quite put out that this situation had been identified by me. He was also outraged that I published it on
the Lisbon Reporter and the LisbonMaine.net.
Chairman LaRochelle claimed I dragged his parents name through the
mud. If you care to check it I have
never blamed anyone other than the town for this situation.
But what is really interesting is that Chairman LaRochelle stated that
he had paid back ten (10) years of back taxes.
How can this possibly be true if Mr. Van Tuinen has not made a
determination as stated in his letter? Apparently,
someone has miss-spoken.
Who do we believe and how do you determine who in lying?
Larry Fillmore
Concerned Citizen
No comments:
Post a Comment