Repeat of 2015 by Joe Hill
Five years
ago Lisbon Council decided to revalue Lisbon's commercial and
residential property. A contract was awarded to William Van Tuinen Tax
Assessment Services. This revaluation was to be done over the four
year period ending in 2015 at a cost of $400,000 dollars.
In the
spring of 2015 we were told that revaluation letters would be sent in
May (2015) giving us time to dispute any potential problems with the
assessors findings before the 2015 tax season. These letters were never
sent.
We were then
told that the new valuation letters were only delayed a few weeks and
would be sent in June of the same year. These letters were never sent.
In
July/August of 2015 we were finally informed that the revaluation was
not even close to being finished. We had been told lies. ( I think the
L word is appropriate here considering what happened)
Late summer (2015) Mr. Van Tuinen and
Lisbon Council with the help of legal advise agreed to extend the
revaluation completion date for another year. They also included a daily
fine for each day that the contract wasn't finished past the new
completion date.
Early 2016
we were told we would get our new valuation letters by the end of
February (2016). Yesterday was the last day of February and no letters
were send and no new date is known for sending out letters.
Let me make
one thing clear. This delay isn't the fault of our tax department and
the original contract was signed by a previous Town Council and town
Manager. The problem is Mr. Van Tuinen and his staff.
Given the
history of this revaluation one would think every effort would be made
to keep deadlines but this hasn't been the case. I see a repeat of 2015
in the making ending in disaster.
Contract
completion fines are only good if there is money available to collect.
What guarantee do we have that we haven't wasted $400,000 dollars of
Lisbon's money?
I think this
problem should be at the top of our Council/Manager's agenda and we
should be kept apprised of the ACTUAL progress of this revaluation.
Respectfully
Joe Hill
No comments:
Post a Comment