Latest Hard Metal Pricng

Thursday, August 8, 2013

One Of The Issues With The Worumbo Mill





WORUMBO MILL QUESTION



At the last Town Council meeting, the councilors conducted a discussion pertaining to the status of the Worumbo Mill property.  This discussion was led by Fern LaRochelle, Chairman of the Town Council, and the owner of the property directly across from the Worumbo Mill.   During this meeting, the members of the audience were not allowed to provide any input.





 Town Manager Stephen G. Eldridge
 
One of the questions discussed was whether or not the town should float a bond for the demolition of the present structure.  If I understood the figures correctly, it would cost the town approximately $500,000 for demolition and clean up the area.  However, along with this is the cost to purchase the property for appropriately $600,000.   Using these figures, the bond would be a little over one (1) million dollars in which the taxpayers will have to pay back.  This ONLY included the purchase of the property, demolition of the building and cleaning up the area.  It does not cover development of the property.



I am very much in favor of doing something with the Worumbo Mill property but I am SURE the taxpayers cannot afford the price tag.  Remember, the taxpayers have suffered a tax increase for the last two years.  Also, the taxpayers are currently forced to support a communication center that is not a Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) and therefore has to have all 911 calls relayed from the Androscoggin County Dispatch.  Also, because of Chief of Police, the taxpayers have to pay for the top of the line for all police equipment such as 2014 Police Interceptors instead of purchasing 2012 or 2013 vehicles to try and save the taxpayers some money.  The Police Department is the largest cost to the town with the least return on investment. 



I personally do not see the need for the people of Lisbon to purchase the Worumbo Mill propertyOnce the town owns the property; the people of Lisbon assume all liabilities for this property.  The town loses the tax money it is currently receiving for the property.  I see purchasing the property as a lose/lose for the taxpayers.  The only person I see gaining anything in this scenario is Chairman LaRochelle because he owns the property next to the mill.  If the town purchases the property and either renovates or demolitions the current structure his property value will increase.



Of course, there is no “Conflict of Interest” here.  I filed a conflict of interest against a councilor with the Ethics Panel and they found no conflict of interest.  I personally believe the Ethics Panel will never side against a councilor, no matter what.



Councilor Gina Mason

Mrs. Fitzgerald and I attempted to offer suggestions on how to get the word out to the people but Chairman LaRochelle would not take comments from the audience.  After the meeting, I spoke with councilors Mason and Lunt suggesting a pamphlet with all the facts and figures be mailed to each resident with the date of the Public Hearing so citizens will be informed as what they are actually talking about.  I understand it is costly but it is the only way to ensure everyone is informed on what is going on because sooner or later they are going to have to vote on this.  I do not know if this did any good because the council does not normally listen to me.



Larry Fillmore

3 comments:

Mary-Ann Morgan said...

WOW what a lottery bonanza for the Millers and Fern Larochelle. The backs of the taxpayers will break with this unbelievably stupid idea. Another conflict of interest for Fern Larochelle. Doesn't this guy have any ethics or concern for the taxpayer? A Town that has lost so much business and yet they want to take on a white elephant. Why didn't they have any concern for other businesses before they failed?

Anonymous said...

The town does not need this burden. The problems is the Millers and the Millers alone. Let them pay to clean up that eye sore.

Gregg said...

Larry,

You, and other town members, provided input on this topic during audience participation and a hearing is scheduled for the 20th to allow for further comments. You complain that we don't listen to you, but you apparently did not listen when it was pointed out the figures in the Sun Journal were NOT correct and the town would NOT be paying the asking price of over $600K, I believe the figure is closer to $100K. As for a conflict of interest for Counselor Larochelle, that would be your opinion and I disagree, but we have disagreed before. The topic of the mill property was brought up numerous times though out the 196 corridor project by many different people.

As for the mill, I stand by my comments in the Sun Journal, the cost to renovate the mill far exceeds the value after restoration. While I understand the historic significance of the building, redevelopment of the site without the building would be of more significance to the future of the town it helped to build.

The Millers have no reason to do anything with the building and it will sit as until the unlikely event someone is willing to invest over $2M into a property that isn't worth close to that. It will remain the key landmark people drive though and what they will remember and think of when they consider investing in our town.

Your idea of a pamphlet with all the facts and figures be mailed to each resident is an outstanding idea, however given the cost and time frame, I would suggest that be done only if the project is sent out for a vote. Like wise, Dot's suggestion of tours of the site so people can get an idea of the possible future use for the 5+ acres is also and outstanding idea, provided we can work that out with Miller Industries.

Lisbon is the perfect place to live and work. We are perfectly situated between Brunswick/Topsham and Lewiston/Auburn, with I95 & I295 putting us with easy access to both Portland and Augusta. I understand the concerns over the cost, but if we stop investing in our town and don't do something to entice growth and development our town will not survive.