State and Local Freedom of Information Issues (FOI-L@listserv.syr.edu) |
Please
suggest references, cites, cases, or informal or unpublished AG
opinions -- state and federal and administrative -- on newspapers being
the required sole publisher of legal notices in your state or country.
Off-- or on--list.
I'm
preparing a formal complaint for the U.S. Attorney General, Antitrust
Division, against the State of Maine law that requires state and local
legal notices to be published in the newspaper for that area or region
(excellent speech by Deputy AAG Hesse, "At the Intersection of Antitrust
and High Tech: Opportunities for Constructive Engagement",
Jan 22, 2014, Sanford, CA, <http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/speeches/303152.pdf>, prepared for Conference on Competition and IP Policy in High-Technology Industries).
Given
that more people get their news from the net than from newspapers, and
given that Maine has provided their students for over 6 years with their
own laptop computers and so are computer literate, and given that the
First Amendment is still in effect and that a Nash equilibrium and other
arguments would strongly suggest, if not prove, that subsidizing
newspapers (especially as their circulations decline) would be harmful
to the newspapers, it is also time to file a formal complaint in civil
court to block this law.
We
have support at the local town level where advertising for bids is way
too expensive so the towns are left with simply calling local providers
to get someone to do the work. Indeed, one Selectman told me at the
last board meeting to "pursue this with a passion." Not a single Board
member objected to his statement.
We
also have data now on five towns on the quality of local newspaper
coverage -- and, as predicted by antitrust theory -- the quality of
coverage of local government activities by the newspaper, compared to
videotapes of the governing board meetings, is unacceptably low. There
are more legal and empirical grounds for demonstrating newspaper
antitrust violations, without being in conflict with precedents (Associated Press v. United States; Tribune
Company v. United States; United States v. Associated Press, Citations 326 U.S. 1
(https://supreme.justia.com/us/326/1/case.html), or Noerr-Pennington Doctrine, or the Parker Immunity Doctrine (Parker, Director of Agriculture, et al. v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341
(https://supreme.justia.com/us/317/341/case.html)63 S. Ct. 307; 87 L. Ed. 315; 1943 U.S. LEXIS
1263; 1943 Trade Cas. (CCH) P56,250).
Dwight Hines
IndyMedia
Maine
No comments:
Post a Comment